Archive for May, 2010

PageRank – Jargon Buster

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

The Serious/Not Serious Series on Jargon

YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS:

Yo bro.

To get by in the hood, you need street cred. In the web hood, street cred is called PageRank.

To get the top street cred in the hood you gotta be connected. You gotta be connected to names – big mo-fo names, like Google and Apple. You’ve gotta run with the big dogs, the bigger the better, and the more the better too. When you connected with a big gang of bad-ass dudes, you get respect and cred.

Street cred goes from 10 down to 0. To get a “10” you gotta be Google, Bo Derek, or Superman, but “3” is common enough for the average brother in the web hood. Nerds get a great big zero, but there is a “N/A” for kids – who ain’t got their cred assessed yet. (The Google-man’s a busy guy, and assesses every crib in the web-hood every three months or so).

To make sales, you gotta make a connection with a user. The user puts out the enquiry with the Google-man, specifying what kinda shit he wants. Google-man acks all the brothers who can supply what the man needs. If a brother can supply, his name goes on his list, then he sorts the list, and the brothers with the biggest cred cahoonies get their names top of the list.

Then the Google-man gives the list to the user.

SERIOUSLY:

PageRank is Google’s way of determining the importance of a webpage or website. A website’s PageRank influences where that site will appear in search results for relevant terms. It can influence the amount of organic (unpaid) traffic that comes to your site from the search engine. It can also influence and inform potential advertisers, partners and others interested in your site. They often check out your PageRank to see what Google thinks of your site before doing business with you.

Google’s view is that if another site links to your webpage, that site is saying that it likes you. Google builds up a picture of your website’s likeability by examining who is linking to your site, how important the linker is and by looking at the context of the link. Not all links are equal and not all links are counted by Google. PageRank Values range from PR0 to PR10.

Google watches out for websites that try to manipulate rankings so it’s not a good idea to engage in dodgy SEO (Search Engine Optimization) practices in an attempt to increase your PageRank.  The complete magic recipe for calculating PageRank is known only to Google and the big “G” works on this recipe (algorithm) all the time.

Probably the best way to improve your website’s PageRank is to ignore it. Concentrate instead on improving the User Experience, creating great content, and building relationships online. A good PageRank will follow. Pay attention to this extract from the Blog of Matt Cutts (who happens to be Head of the Webspam Team at Google):

“….A lot of bad SEO happens because people say “I’ll force my way to the top of Google first, and then everyone will find out about my site.” Putting rankings before the creation of a great site is in many ways putting the cart before the horse. Often the search rankings follow from the fact that you’re getting to be well-known on the web completely outside the sphere of search…. By chasing a great user experience above search rankings, many sites turn out to be what search engines would want to return anyway.”*

Remember that PageRank is a Google thing. If you’re building a business online, don’t obsess about Google all the time. Organic search engine traffic is great but look for other ways to bring visitors to your site. Don’t let your business model become solely dependent on Google.  For long-term viability try to think beyond the big “G”.  There’s an insightful post in the archives at DoshDosh.com which gives lots of food for thought about why PageRank may be overrated.

What do you think? Do you think your business model is overly-dependent on Google? If so, are you thinking about taking steps to deal with this?

*This quote is buried deep in the Comments section of the particular blog post. We’ve extracted it to make your life easier but read the entire blog post (including comments) if you have the energy and inclination.

Footnote: The information in this series is stuff that we’ve picked up along the way when setting up The Wittery. We don’t claim to be experts but we’re happy to share what we’ve learned.  The stuff in the “You Cannot Be Serious” section comes straight from the noggins of witty writer members at The Wittery.

Other Jargon Buster Articles:

Attraction Marketing;  Buzz Marketing;  Content Strategy;   Duplicate Content;  Linkerati; SEO; SERPS; The CloudUser Experience

Welcome to The Wittery® Blog (aka The Witty Writer Marketplace)

Visit The Wittery to find Freelance Writers to write Witty Content for Your Business.

Two Brothers

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

(Guest Blog by Soxless)

There were two brothers in my class at school. I shall call them “Con” and “Frank”, because those were their real names. We were clever for our age, and always spelled graffiti correctly, and we also figured out that if “Con” was short for “Constantine”, then “Frank” must have been short for “Frankenstein”.

They had an age difference of 18 months. None of us could figure out why they were in the same class, and they were both evasive when asked. That reticence to speak about their being in the same class was their only common trait. They didn’t look alike; they seemed to have an unusually high number of “uncles”; they didn’t hang out together; they didn’t speak with the same accent, and they were, linguistically, in a different class.

Con was refined, eloquent, and polite. Frank was boorish, rude and profane. Frank was even ruder and profaner than the rest of the class, who were street urchins. Our language may have been in the gutter, but Frank’s was firmly embedded in the sewer. He was so crude that Con often had to “translate” for him. This is a real conversation that happened. I remember it clearly, it happened on the 31st April, twenty years ago to the day.

Frank:  F**king homework.

Con:  Goodness, hasn’t Mr Smith set rather a lot of learning reinforcement for tonight.

Frank:   Smith’s a Ba****d.

Con:  Mr Smith‘s parentage is disputable.

Frank:  That mother-fu**ker Smith gave me detention too.

Con:  Mr Smith has Oedipal tendencies, and administered a rather harsh and unjustified punishment to me.

Frank:  Con, stop using big words or f**k off.

Con:  Frank intimates that I should either refrain from the continual use of words of more than one syllable, or indulge in sexual activity whilst travelling.

Frank:  Con, you are really pis*ing me off now.

Con:  My dear brother is beginning to realise that he is becoming progressively more irate, and that could lead to an incident of incontinence.

Frank:  Don’t be a w**ker.

Con:  Please refrain from indulging in hedonistic, individual, self-pleasure.

Frank:  Holy f**k.

Con:  Immaculate conception.

But what of Con and Frank now? None of us know for sure, but of course there are the usual rumours: the consensus seems to be that Con went on to become a priest in England, and that Frank became a lawyer, and is currently defending Con against scurrilous claims made by one of his ten-year old parishioners.

Soxless is an alien: externally he is a project manager and statistician, while internally his organs are those of a fun-loving writer of comedy. His writing career got off to a flying stop when he was first rejected by Suite101, but he has now written around 100 articles for them. (He got accepted on the second attempt, after reading the application instructions properly). He is the proud owner of one low-mileage wife, and the proud property of two sons, both of whom hope to graduate as delinquents sometime soon.

Welcome to The Wittery® Blog (aka The Witty Writer Marketplace)

Visit The Wittery to find Freelance Writers to write Witty Content for Your Business.

(Guest Bloggers are Writer Members at The Wittery)

Duplicate Content – Jargon Buster

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

The Serious/Not Serious Series on Jargon

YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS:

Bad bad bad naughty.  Who’s been a vewey nasty blog then?  Noses Will Be rubbed in the bad duplicate content.  Otherwise known as “the little content that can’t”.  There are a number of prestidigitators out there who have not been doing their fair share of creating delightfully diverting NEW stuff for everybody to read.

Luckily a NEW task force has been created to take care of this. Every contributor to the Great Noggin Of The Net will have to pass through the Churn-A-Lator, which will assess every piece and determine if it’s sufficiently fragrant.  Any material judged free of fresh and therefore unfit will be chewed up and spat out and finally subjected to the indignity of appearing as an infomercial on high rotate, even if the subject matter was originally just an uninspired moan about the peeing habits of a neighbor’s cat.

The Churn-A-Lator doesn’t make personal appearances yet, but plans are afoot for the development of a complementary piece of technology called the Blahdeblah-O-Tron which will be so advanced it will not only vet political speeches, it will give them, making use of the deathless nuggets of pithy prose fed to it previously.

Then the Churn-A-Lator will be set upon it and the approving populace can watch them both battle it out unto the death in a massive circular pit, surrounded by jeering HP printers.

SERIOUSLY:

In simple terms, duplicate content is content that appears on more than one web page. There can be valid reasons for having duplicate content across more than one web page. For example, you may have a print version of the page.

However, many people use the term to describe content which has been duplicated with intent to deceive the search engines and manipulate rankings in the search results.  If you copy content from another web page and place it on your own web page Google is likely to consider this type of duplicate content as “spam”.  The big “G” is likely to punish you for this (not to mention the fact that it is usually also a form of theft).

How to avoid this fate? Create your own original fresh content.  It’s hard work but you will be rewarded in the long-run.

Additional Resources:

Blogging with Duplicate Content proves counterproductive. This post from iePlexus.com explains why business blogs should avoid duplicate content. It’s clearly written and easy to understand, even if you’re not so hot on technical issues relating to duplicate content.

Duplicate Content and Multiple Site Issues:  This video from Google Webmaster Channel explores issues relating to duplicate content. The first third of the video provides a clear explanation of the term.  After that, it gets quite technical (e.g. references to Canonical, 301 redirects, HTP Server, Rel=Canonical, UI device, HTML Tag), so you may want to jump back out of the video after the first bit if that kind of stuff is not for you.

[The "You Cannot Be Serious" part of this post comes to you courtesy of a Wittery ghost writer. The rest of the post emanated from Witto's fingertips. Do let Witto know if there are particular topics that you would like him to cover in this Jargon Series. He's highly suggestible.]

Other Jargon Buster Articles:

Attraction Marketing;  Buzz Marketing;  Content Strategy;  Linkerati;  PageRank;  SEO;  SERPSThe CloudUser Experience

Welcome to The Wittery® Blog (aka The Witty Writer Marketplace)

Find Freelance Writers at The Wittery to write Fresh Engaging Content for Your Business.